Sen. Russ Feingold has introduced resolutions that would censure President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales for what Feingold calls the Bush administration's misleading the nation into war, and undermining the rule of law.
In the House, Rep. Maurice Hinchey, D-N.Y., introduced companion resolutions.
"Congress cannot stay silent when the American people are demanding that this administration be held accountable for its blatant misconduct regarding Iraq and its attack on the rule of law," Feingold, D-Wis., said in a statement Monday.
"From misleading this country into invading Iraq to establishing a warrantless domestic spy program, this White House has continuously misled and deceived the American people while disregarding the rule of law that guides our democracy," Hinchey said in a statement Monday,
Feingold announced last month that he would introduce the two resolutions.
One would censure Bush and Cheney for what it calls misleading the country about the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's regime, and inadequate planning for military action in Iraq, among other things.
The other would censure Bush and Gonzales for the warrantless surveillance program against suspected terrorists, and what the resolution calls misleading Congress about the firings of U.S. attorneys, among other things.
Taken together, the measures would amount to a formal condemnation of Bush, Cheney and Gonzales.
Newsday
Tuesday, August 7, 2007
Wednesday, August 1, 2007
Russ still protecting your privacy!
Statement of U.S. Senator Russ Feingold
On the Proposed FISA Legislation
August 1, 2007
“We need to wiretap terrorists, and we should address the problem that has been identified with FISA with respect to foreign-to-foreign communications. But the administration’s overly broad proposal goes far beyond that and would leave critical decisions related to surveillance involving Americans entirely up to the Attorney General. The proposal from the Democratic leadership is better and involves FISA court review from the start. But it does not have adequate safeguards to protect Americans’ privacy. The bill should also include a 90-day sunset to ensure Congress has the chance to identify and fix any problems with this new proposal.”
(Also, this post from 'done that')
On the Proposed FISA Legislation
August 1, 2007
“We need to wiretap terrorists, and we should address the problem that has been identified with FISA with respect to foreign-to-foreign communications. But the administration’s overly broad proposal goes far beyond that and would leave critical decisions related to surveillance involving Americans entirely up to the Attorney General. The proposal from the Democratic leadership is better and involves FISA court review from the start. But it does not have adequate safeguards to protect Americans’ privacy. The bill should also include a 90-day sunset to ensure Congress has the chance to identify and fix any problems with this new proposal.”
(Also, this post from 'done that')
Saturday, July 21, 2007
Gore/Feingold
Don't Count Russ Feingold Out Yet
(US News) The Democrats' maverick senator, Wisconsin's Russ Feingold, surprised many when he finished a national listening tour by pulling his hat from the ring of 2008 presidential candidates, claiming he lacked the fire in the belly.
Well, don't count him out yet,--at least as a provocative vice presidential candidate. That's because a new biography paints the coauthor of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law as one of the leaders of the progressive movement spreading in the nation as activists look for lawmakers who don't play politics safe.
Feingold, out next week, opens with a gripping clash between the leading character and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton as she looked for loopholes around the McCain-Feingold law. In a closed-door meeting in 2002, Feingold objected to her efforts.
"You're not living in the real world," shouts Clinton. "Senator, I do live in the real world, and I'm doing just fine by it," responds Feingold,...continued
(US News) The Democrats' maverick senator, Wisconsin's Russ Feingold, surprised many when he finished a national listening tour by pulling his hat from the ring of 2008 presidential candidates, claiming he lacked the fire in the belly.
Well, don't count him out yet,--at least as a provocative vice presidential candidate. That's because a new biography paints the coauthor of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law as one of the leaders of the progressive movement spreading in the nation as activists look for lawmakers who don't play politics safe.
Feingold, out next week, opens with a gripping clash between the leading character and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton as she looked for loopholes around the McCain-Feingold law. In a closed-door meeting in 2002, Feingold objected to her efforts.
"You're not living in the real world," shouts Clinton. "Senator, I do live in the real world, and I'm doing just fine by it," responds Feingold,...continued
Friday, February 23, 2007
Feingold: Presidency in reach for blacks, women
Democrat says he prefers Senate to vice presidency
By Kelly McBride kmcbride@greenbaypressgazette.com
The United States is ready for either a black president or a female president, Sen. Russ Feingold said Thursday, but he's not necessarily endorsing the candidates that fit those descriptions — yet.
Back in his home state to host several listening sessions this week, Feingold, D-Wis., spoke to the Green Bay Press-Gazette editorial board about a variety of foreign and domestic issues — including the 2008 presidential race.
"I think a woman can win this thing. I think a black person can win this thing," Feingold said. Then, with a laugh, "I think a Jewish person could've even won this thing."
Although no longer talking of a presidential bid, Feingold — who is Jewish — insists he's right where he wants to be. He won't completely quash the notion of becoming someone's running mate — if the opportunity arose — he said. But for now, he's happy being a senator.
"It's not what I want," he said of potential running-mate status. "You know, it wouldn't be an awful thing. I'm not saying that. … But I obviously prefer this."
Feingold isn't currently endorsing anyone, he said, but tends to lean toward people who support his views — he mentioned former Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., by name.
"But whether or not I'll actually endorse somebody — I might," he said. "But I'm very anxious to see how people will perform."
During his listening sessions — Feingold is holding one in Door County and one in Kewaunee County today — he hears about a variety of issues from constituents, he said.
And while the Iraq war has come up more frequently during the past couple of years, there's one concern — health care — that remains the most talked-about topic overall.
"People are so frustrated with the employer-based system," he said. "… I have always believed in a universal health care system."
Feingold and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., are working to introduce a bill that would peg three states to pilot different types of health care systems — for instance, health savings accounts — to see what works best.
"We'd have real facts, on the ground, to compare what's working and what isn't," Feingold said.
By Kelly McBride kmcbride@greenbaypressgazette.com
The United States is ready for either a black president or a female president, Sen. Russ Feingold said Thursday, but he's not necessarily endorsing the candidates that fit those descriptions — yet.
Back in his home state to host several listening sessions this week, Feingold, D-Wis., spoke to the Green Bay Press-Gazette editorial board about a variety of foreign and domestic issues — including the 2008 presidential race.
"I think a woman can win this thing. I think a black person can win this thing," Feingold said. Then, with a laugh, "I think a Jewish person could've even won this thing."
Although no longer talking of a presidential bid, Feingold — who is Jewish — insists he's right where he wants to be. He won't completely quash the notion of becoming someone's running mate — if the opportunity arose — he said. But for now, he's happy being a senator.
"It's not what I want," he said of potential running-mate status. "You know, it wouldn't be an awful thing. I'm not saying that. … But I obviously prefer this."
Feingold isn't currently endorsing anyone, he said, but tends to lean toward people who support his views — he mentioned former Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., by name.
"But whether or not I'll actually endorse somebody — I might," he said. "But I'm very anxious to see how people will perform."
During his listening sessions — Feingold is holding one in Door County and one in Kewaunee County today — he hears about a variety of issues from constituents, he said.
And while the Iraq war has come up more frequently during the past couple of years, there's one concern — health care — that remains the most talked-about topic overall.
"People are so frustrated with the employer-based system," he said. "… I have always believed in a universal health care system."
Feingold and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., are working to introduce a bill that would peg three states to pilot different types of health care systems — for instance, health savings accounts — to see what works best.
"We'd have real facts, on the ground, to compare what's working and what isn't," Feingold said.
Monday, January 29, 2007
Feingold Calls War Bluff
Senate Democrats oppose the war in Iraq, they just don't plan on stopping it.They have discovered that standing up to the president is not quite as easy as vilifying him.
Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., has decided, however, to challenge what he calls the "timidity" of Democratic leaders. He is going to introduce legislation cutting off funding for the Iraq war and he may do it, he told me, as early as this week.
I reached him by telephone Monday in Fond du Lac, Wis., where he was conducting one of his "Listening Sessions" with voters during a snowstorm.
I asked him whether Democratic voters were further to the left than their elected leaders, especially their presidential candidates, when it came to the war.
"That is not only true of Democrats," Feingold said, "it is true of the public as a whole. The mainstream view of the American people is to get out of Iraq."
Cutting off funds only for the planned 21,500 troop surge in Iraq and passing resolutions condemning the war has become the fallback position of Senate Democrats who are fearful of being portrayed as unpatriotic, cowardly, "Mommy Party" haters of the military.
And they have reason to be afraid. The White House plays hardball. The White House is never reluctant to accuse those who oppose its policies in Iraq of being bashers of our troops and abettors of our enemies.
The Bush administration released a statement last weekend saying that even those who just want to prohibit the surge are sending "the wrong message to our troops, our enemies, and the Iraqi people."
In Iowa Sunday, Hillary Clinton said: "At this point, I am not ready to cut off funding for American troops. I am not going to do that." She said that even if Congress passed such a bill, it would be pointless because we have "a president who will veto anything that impinges on his authority."
Feingold is not impressed with that argument. "It is not true this is a futile exercise," he said. "We can say no."
If, for instance, the Democrats attached an Iraq funding cutoff to an appropriations bill, the president would risk shutting down the government by vetoing it.
But some Democrats are worried. As Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told my colleague John Bresnahan Thursday, Republicans "would like this debate to be as (to) whether or not we are going to be cutting off money for troops."
And others, including Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr., D-Del., who is running for president, says a funding cutoff probably is unconstitutional.
Which is why Feingold is chairing a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Tuesday to "help inform my colleagues and the public about Congress's power to end a war."
Feingold has gathered various legal and other experts to testify, but the result is a foregone conclusion. "I am going to lay out the reality that Congress does have this power," Feingold said. "The president does not have the unilateral power to (continue the war) without our consent."
Feingold said a cutoff of funding six months after the law is enacted "makes sense, it is constitutional, and our troops will not be left in the lurch."
Under Feingold's plan, the administration would have to safely redeploy troops from Iraq except for those needed to target counter-terrorism operations and provide security for U.S "infrastructure and civilian personnel" there, and a "limited number" to train Iraqi security services.
Feingold is going to put his fellow Democrats to the test: If you are really against this war, he is going to tell them, now is the time to show it.
"Those (Democrats) who are timid on this, who are they listening to?" he said. "The people don't want us to talk just about ending the escalation. They think this whole war is wrong."
By: ROGER SIMON @ Politico
Thursday, January 25, 2007
Feingold Pushes Plan to Cut Off War Funds
By: John Bresnahan
January 25, 2007 06:57 PM EST
Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., has scheduled a hearing next Tuesday in his Judiciary Committee subcommittee to explore whether Congress has the authority to cut off funding for the U.S. military campaign in Iraq. The move comes as Congress prepares to vote on a congressional resolution opposing President Bush's escalation of the war.
Feingold, a fierce war critic, will force Democrats to consider an option many consider politically suicidal: denying funds to the military and U.S. soldiers to force a quicker end to the war. Democratic leaders have privately called on members to restrain from cutting off funding and focus on congressional resolutions condemning the Bush policy. The resolutions are nonbinding and therefore symbolic.
Republicans "would like this debate to be as whether or not we are going to be cutting off money for the troops," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid recently told The Politico. "The logical conclusion is that a lot of things can happen. But right now, the most important thing is to tell the president that what he has done with the escalation is wrong. And that's what we are doing, bi-partisanly."
Feingold, who chairs the Subcommittee on the Constitution, will question several witnesses, including a Library of Congress official and legal experts from Harvard, Duke, and the University of Virginia, on the issue. Senior Bush administration officials have publicly argued that Congress' has no such right, but Feingold plans to introduce legislation to force President Bush to American forces out of the troubled country.
"Congress holds the power of the purse and of the president continues to advance his failed Iraq policy, we have have the responsibility to use that power to safely redeploy our troops from Iraq," Feingold said in a statement released by his office on Thursday. "I will soon be introducing legislation to use the power of the purse to end what is clearly one of the greatest mistakes in the history of the nation's foreign policy."
Politico.com
January 25, 2007 06:57 PM EST
Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., has scheduled a hearing next Tuesday in his Judiciary Committee subcommittee to explore whether Congress has the authority to cut off funding for the U.S. military campaign in Iraq. The move comes as Congress prepares to vote on a congressional resolution opposing President Bush's escalation of the war.
Feingold, a fierce war critic, will force Democrats to consider an option many consider politically suicidal: denying funds to the military and U.S. soldiers to force a quicker end to the war. Democratic leaders have privately called on members to restrain from cutting off funding and focus on congressional resolutions condemning the Bush policy. The resolutions are nonbinding and therefore symbolic.
Republicans "would like this debate to be as whether or not we are going to be cutting off money for the troops," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid recently told The Politico. "The logical conclusion is that a lot of things can happen. But right now, the most important thing is to tell the president that what he has done with the escalation is wrong. And that's what we are doing, bi-partisanly."
Feingold, who chairs the Subcommittee on the Constitution, will question several witnesses, including a Library of Congress official and legal experts from Harvard, Duke, and the University of Virginia, on the issue. Senior Bush administration officials have publicly argued that Congress' has no such right, but Feingold plans to introduce legislation to force President Bush to American forces out of the troubled country.
"Congress holds the power of the purse and of the president continues to advance his failed Iraq policy, we have have the responsibility to use that power to safely redeploy our troops from Iraq," Feingold said in a statement released by his office on Thursday. "I will soon be introducing legislation to use the power of the purse to end what is clearly one of the greatest mistakes in the history of the nation's foreign policy."
Politico.com
Friday, January 19, 2007
Feingold to Bush: Get our troops out
Just one day after President George W. Bush announced the deployment of 20,000 additional troops to Iraq, U.S. Senator Russ Feingold, D-Wis., proposed Congressional intervention using "the power of the purse."
In a Jan. 11 Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Feingold criticized the Bush administration's new strategy and asked Congress to use its financial capabilities to restrict the war's funding.
Feingold has long been one of the nation's most outspoken critics against the war in Iraq and has consistently introduced legislation for a withdrawal timetable of troops. Earlier this year, he promised to draft legislation to the 110th Congress that would redeploy troops from Iraq to other parts of the world.
"Congress must bring an end to what has been one of the greatest foreign policy mistakes in the history of our nation," Feingold said in a statement shortly after the president's Jan. 10 address. "It is time to bring our troops out of Iraq and refocus on defeating the global terrorist networks that threaten this country."
In an e-mail to The Badger Herald, U.S. Rep. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., said she supports Feingold's call to restrict the war's funding.
"The power of the purse strings is the only means Congress has to end this misguided war," Baldwin said. "Certainly that will be in the forefront of our minds when the president sends us his next request for funding."
Baldwin also said in a statement that she supports a measure by U.S. Rep. Martin Meehan, D-Mass., that calls for Congressional approval of any escalation of the war and a specific plan for a phased withdrawal of American forces.
U.S. Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., expressed sincere confidence in the president's new strategy in a Jan. 10 statement, calling it "the first step to removing our soldiers from Iraq, and bringing them back home for good."
The president hopes his strategy of increasing American forces in Baghdad and the Anbar province -- the "home base for al-Qaida" -- will place continued pressure on Iraqi insurgents.
"If we increase our support at this crucial moment and help the Iraqis break the current cycle of violence, we can hasten the day our troops begin coming home," Bush said, according to a transcript released by the White House.
Bush also called on the Iraqi government to uphold its key benchmarks this year, including provincial elections, shared oil revenues with civilians, $10 billion on infrastructure and the responsibility of securing all provinces by November.
More so than in previous announcements, Bush also conceded the failures of past strategies.
"The situation in Iraq is unacceptable to the American people, and it is unacceptable to me," Bush said. "Where mistakes have been made, the responsibility rests with me."
by Keegan Kyle Badger Herald Friday, January 19, 2007
In a Jan. 11 Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Feingold criticized the Bush administration's new strategy and asked Congress to use its financial capabilities to restrict the war's funding.
Feingold has long been one of the nation's most outspoken critics against the war in Iraq and has consistently introduced legislation for a withdrawal timetable of troops. Earlier this year, he promised to draft legislation to the 110th Congress that would redeploy troops from Iraq to other parts of the world.
"Congress must bring an end to what has been one of the greatest foreign policy mistakes in the history of our nation," Feingold said in a statement shortly after the president's Jan. 10 address. "It is time to bring our troops out of Iraq and refocus on defeating the global terrorist networks that threaten this country."
In an e-mail to The Badger Herald, U.S. Rep. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., said she supports Feingold's call to restrict the war's funding.
"The power of the purse strings is the only means Congress has to end this misguided war," Baldwin said. "Certainly that will be in the forefront of our minds when the president sends us his next request for funding."
Baldwin also said in a statement that she supports a measure by U.S. Rep. Martin Meehan, D-Mass., that calls for Congressional approval of any escalation of the war and a specific plan for a phased withdrawal of American forces.
U.S. Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., expressed sincere confidence in the president's new strategy in a Jan. 10 statement, calling it "the first step to removing our soldiers from Iraq, and bringing them back home for good."
The president hopes his strategy of increasing American forces in Baghdad and the Anbar province -- the "home base for al-Qaida" -- will place continued pressure on Iraqi insurgents.
"If we increase our support at this crucial moment and help the Iraqis break the current cycle of violence, we can hasten the day our troops begin coming home," Bush said, according to a transcript released by the White House.
Bush also called on the Iraqi government to uphold its key benchmarks this year, including provincial elections, shared oil revenues with civilians, $10 billion on infrastructure and the responsibility of securing all provinces by November.
More so than in previous announcements, Bush also conceded the failures of past strategies.
"The situation in Iraq is unacceptable to the American people, and it is unacceptable to me," Bush said. "Where mistakes have been made, the responsibility rests with me."
by Keegan Kyle Badger Herald Friday, January 19, 2007
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
